Hammurabi Reaction

directlys laws are not as harsh as Hammurabis. They are more civilized. For example, n whiz of todays laws include am cast offating other masss body parts. Hammurabi thought it was necessary to amputate arms, breasts, digits, etc. I believe our laws are better, overall because they do not incorporate somatic punishment. I suppose Hammurabis Code of Law was an excellent preventive against crime, and very few quite a little would try to break the law. I think this is due to how harsh the laws were.There was zero tolerance. For example, the sixth law says, If any one steal the property of a temple or of the court, he shall be put to death, and alike the one who receives the stolen thing from him shall be put to death. Also, because of the cogency of some punishments (dismemberment, whippings, drowning, etc. ), I do not think people would want to test Hammurabi. I do not think Babylon was a safer society than the society that we currently live in.There should be no motive for the extreme laws I learned about if people behaved. I also think that these laws would cause many deaths. I think many members of the Babylon refining were killed, sometimes unnecessarily. If any one ensnare another, putting a forbidding upon him, but he cannot prove it, then he that ensnared him shall be put to death. This law would put people to death if they made a dour accusationin my opinion, this is too extreme and living under the Hammurabi laws would be like living under a dictatorship.